Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Wednesday 13 January 2021


If we look more closely, Wittgenstein’s entire philosophical oeuvre, and especially his later work, is run through with metaphors and allegories of liberation, of exits and escapes.

And what Plutarch taught them is this: Heroes care. True heroism, as the ancients understood, isn’t about strength, or boldness, or even courage. It’s about compassion.

The historical imagination is central to history, but not in quite the same way as it is to knowledge in general. What is imagined need not be wholly fanciful. It may be something as hard-nosed as pondering the cause of my car engine failing.

Claustrophobia conveys bad feelings about the environment and demands that the conscious mind come up with a solution. The conscious mind can override the sensation until the sensory system decides to make itself unbearable. It becomes a conversation between consciousness and sensory-ness. And this is an insight into comfort and homeostasis.

Liberty has become license, and the social basis of the modern, liberal state has eroded away.

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Tuesday 12 January 2021

 



[W]e need imagination to grasp reality – that part of it immediately before us, and its wider horizons that exceed the reach of our physical senses – that we can speak of a ‘knowledge’ of the imagination. Imagination has a noetic character; it is the source and medium of our other way of knowing. It shows us aspects and dimensions of reality that we would miss without it – and which much, if not most of official Western culture has missed since the new way of knowing became dominant.

Participation involves an I-Thou relationship with creation—that is, a personal relationship characterized by immediacy and intimacy, as opposed to an impersonal, disconnected I-It relationship that keeps reality at arm’s length. The savage participates in nature to such a degree that reality blazes with intrinsic meaning. Life is directly perceived to be vital and sacred, as in Blake’s poetic vision of tigers burning brightly in the forests of the night. The myths of primal societies are therefore auxiliary, mere reminders of what their inhabitants experience directly, immediately, and continuously—that they are connected to all of creation . . . .
Participation [as a way of knowing] is urged by David Abram, Owen Barfield, and Giambattista Vico (in the form of “poetic wisdom”) as well a number of others . . . .

“One of the most remarkable characteristics of human nature,” writes Lotze, “is, alongside so much selfishness in specific instances, the freedom from envy which the present displays toward the future.”

Yet Nazi policy, realized best in the phony world of propaganda, was well served by the fabrication. Had the Nazis been content merely to draw up a bill of indictment against the Jews and propagandize the notion that there are subhuman and superhuman peoples, they would hardly have succeeded in convincing common sense that the Jews were subhuman. Lying was not enough. In order to be believed, the Nazis had to fabricate reality itself and make Jews look subhuman. So that even today, when faced by the atrocity films, common sense will say: “But don’t they look like criminals?” Or, if incapable of grasping an innocence beyond virtue and vice, people will say: “What terrible things these Jews must have done to have the Germans do this to them!”

The General Theory [by John Mayard Keynes] was a book about, among other things, inequality and social progress. The central problems of the twentieth century, Keynes argued, were best solved by alleviating inequality. Enterprise and economic growth were driven not by the unique genius and vast fortunes of the very rich but by the purchasing power of the masses, which created markets for new ideas. To put people to work, governments needed to create systems of support for the poor and the middle class, not new favors for the rich.

The nagging need to breathe is activated from a cluster of neurons called the central chemoreceptors, located at the base of the brain stem. When we’re breathing too slowly and carbon dioxide levels rise, the central chemoreceptors monitor these changes and send alarm signals to the brain, telling our lungs to breathe faster and more deeply. When we’re breathing too quickly, these chemoreceptors direct the body to breathe more slowly to increase carbon dioxide levels. This is how our bodies determine how fast and often we breathe, not by the amount of oxygen, but by the level of carbon dioxide. Chemoreception is one of the most fundamental functions of life.


Monday, January 11, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Monday 11 January 2021

 


And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.” And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. “Reality control,” they called it; in Newspeak, “doublethink.”

Feelings one “has”; love occurs. Feelings dwell in man, but man dwells in his love. This is no metaphor but actuality: love does not cling to an I, as if the You were merely its “content” or object; it is between I and You.

In governing effectively, coercion is perceived as impoverishing and dehumanizing. So the consummate political model in Daoism, corresponding to the consummate experience itself, is described as wuwei (“noncoercive activity”) and ziran (“self-so-ing,” or “what is spontaneously so”).


“On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog”

And by reflecting on it we can perhaps detect one more characteristic which art must have, if it is to forgo both, entertainment-value and magical value, and draw a subject-matter from its audience themselves. It must be prophetic.

For words are not mere tools, neither are they mere symbols. They are representative realities; they remind us of the inevitable connection between imagination and reality. . . . The corruption of speech involves the corruption of truth, and the corruption of words means the debasement of speech which is the debasement of our most human and historic gifts. [John Lukacs]

Jonathan Swift, “On the Difficulty of Knowing One’s Self,” says you must have a reflective mirror to achieve self-knowledge: “A Man can no more know his own Heart than he can know his own Face, any other Way than by Reflection.” For Swift this reflection comes from the regard of others.

Meaning perception is our ability to step back and see something as a whole, to see the forest, and not only the trees. Immediacy perception, as its name suggests, is our ability to focus on individual details, what is immediately before us. It is like a searchlight. It has a powerful beam, yet it has one problem: “it can only focus on one thing at a time,” hence Hume’s failure to see the connection between cause and effect.




Saturday, January 9, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Saturday 9 January 2021 (Three Days After the U.S. Capital Was Sacked by the Barbarians)

 


I've been off my game for a couple days, distracted by the sacking of the U.S. Capital by the barbarians. I'm hoping no such further distractions come along. Hoping. 


The supremacy of a dogma and the single aim of party line, of aggrandizement of the family or the junta of colonels, count more than the exemplar of tyranny in a single person. Absolutism is not a ruthless ruler, but a ruthless rule—and this we don’t easily remember, for our minds fix upon the figures of czars and crime lords. These images serve to keep the danger of tyranny projected onto Stalin, Genghis Khan and Al Capone, protecting us from the absolutism that can rule the psyche in the guise of fundamentalism in religion, bottom-lineism in business and progress in the sciences.


[M]uch of Keynes’ enthusiastic disposition came from his enduring faith in the power of ideas. He had been thinking about the economic miseries of the postwar world for a decade and had come to the conclusion that global calamity was a result of simple intellectual error. The problems were great, but they had straightforward and essentially painless solutions.
Was the Great Depression a "simple intellectual error?" Hard to believe, but had all of the wealth and productive capacity in the world suddenly disappeared?

The manifestation of the wind of thought is not knowledge; it is the ability to tell right from wrong, beautiful from ugly. And this, at the rare moments when the stakes are on the table, may indeed prevent catastrophes, at least for the self.

No one in his right senses can believe—as certain German student groups recently theorized—that only when the government has been forced “to practice violence openly” will the rebels be able “to fight against this shit society (Scheissgesellschaft) with adequate means and destroy it.” (Quoted in Der Spiegel, February 10, 1969, p. 30.) This linguistically (though hardly intellectually) vulgarized new version of the old Communist nonsense of the thirties, that the victory of fascism was all to the good for those who were against it, is either sheer play-acting, the “revolutionary” variant of hypocrisy, or testifies to the political idiocy of “believers.” Except that forty years ago it was Stalin’s deliberate pro-Hitler policy and not just stupid theorizing that stood behind it.
Seems relevant, do you think?

It just takes the slightest effort to consciously hijack control and determine for ourselves how deeply we breathe, how often, and even stop it altogether for long stretches until our bodies have no choice but to wrest back control when we pass out. This makes breathwork the perfect wedge between our autonomic and somatic systems. And yet the control switch between consciousness and unconsciousness is so perfectly smooth that we don’t always notice what a feat it is.

But psychologists have shown that power corrupts our mental processes almost at once. When a feeling of power is induced in people, they are less likely to take others' viewpoint and more likely to center their thinking on themselves. The result is a reduced ability to comprehend how others see, think, and feel. Power, among other things, induces blindness toward others.

[H]ence also the coining of the new term I have used for my title: Personal Knowledge. The two words may seem to contradict each other: for true knowledge is deemed impersonal, universally established, objective. But the seeming contradiction is resolved by modifying the conception of knowing.




Thursday, January 7, 2021

My Favorite Books of 2020

My Favorite Books of 2020

The following is a review of the favorite books that I completed last year. Some  started the year before, or even earlier, but they go in for this year if I completed them this year. And, of course, I started some books in 2020 that I've yet to finish. I include most of the books that I read last year. There are two reasons for this. One, I read even more news articles and essays than usual to keep up with current events (and my goodness it was a busy year on that account). And, two, I'm a very selective reader. I usually won't start a book unless I'm confident that I'll be getting something worthwhile out of taking the time and effort to read it. Most of the books I will cite I've reviewed, although a couple of late reads haven't been reviewed yet and I don't tend to review well-known fiction. 

So, on to the list. 


Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption

This was an outstanding book, at once uplifting and horrifying. Uplifting as we read about Stevenson and his colleagues and clients struggling for justice. Horrifying as I read about the South (mostly) in the 1990s maintaining a legal system that seems little different than of Jim Crow days. One would have thought that the world of To Kill a Mockingbird would be long past, but not with many of Stevenson's cases. 



The Principles of History and Other Writings in Philosophy of History