Showing posts with label Albert Einstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Albert Einstein. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Wednesday 25 May 2021

 



Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution.
– Albert Einstein



Taxes are interesting. They are one way governments guide a society and fund governmental activities, more the former than the latter. They are as old as civilization. An ancient manifestation of the power of the state. It’s possible that both debt and money were invented in the earliest cities, specifically in order to enable and regularize taxation. Both of them being forms of IOU.

The metaphor achieves the “carrying over”—metapherein—of a genuine and seemingly impossible metabasis eis alio genos, the transition from one existential state, that of thinking, to another, that of being an appearance among appearances, and this can be done only by analogies. (Kant gives as an example of a successful metaphor the description of the despotic state as a “mere machine (like a hand mill)” because it is “governed by an individual absolute will. . . . For between a despotic state and a hand mill there is, to be sure, no similarity; but there is a similarity in the rules according to which we reflect upon these two things and their causality.”

Fear, moreover, becomes pointless when the selection of victims is completely free from all reference to an individual’s actions or thoughts. Fear, though certainly the all-pervasive mood in totalitarian countries, is no longer a principle of action and can no longer serve as a guide to specific deeds. Totalitarian tyranny is unprecedented in that it melds people together in the desert of isolation and atomization and then introduces a gigantic motion into the tranquillity of the cemetery. No guiding principle of action taken from the realm of human action—such as virtue, honor, fear—is needed or could be used to set into motion a body politic whose essence is motion implemented by terror.

As Heraclitus said: “Underworld souls perceive by smelling.” Twenty-five hundred years later, we say that the person who can get down has a quick apprehension—“street smarts”—and senses reality behind the front. Ancient descriptions of the underworld maintain that in this realm nothing solid exists, only images, phantoms, ghosts, smoke, mist, shades, dreams.

Metaphysics is for us the name of a science, and has been for many centuries, because for many centuries it has been found necessary, and still is found necessary, to think in a systematic or orderly fashion about the subjects that Aristotle discussed in the group of treatises collectively known by that name.

Their [confidence mens'] genius lies in figuring out what, precisely, it is we want, and how they can present themselves as the perfect vehicle for delivering on that desire.

Monday, January 4, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Monday 4 January 2021

 


But Einstein was only one of many thinkers and artists for whom “time” had become a central concern. The cubist visions of Picasso and Braque presented a perception of “simultaneity,” of “everythingatonce” rather than “one-thing-at-a-time.”

Wars, when they erupted, increasingly were likely to be intrastate rather than interstate. Kissinger, the power politician focused on nation-states and national interest, looked on this future with gloom. He knew he had no answers.

Many factors went into building political power among nations, from the most unchanging, like geography, to the most mutable and evanescent, like public opinion or morale. Population, raw materials, industrial capacity, technology, and leadership all contributed to power, but for Morgenthau no factor was more important than national character.

And yet, with his love of the Western tradition, Strauss insistently denied that the Nazis could be traced back to Europe’s Christian heritage. To believe such a thing was to grant a victory to the Third Reich and its nihilistic destruction of the past. “Only someone completely ignorant would say that anti-Jewish thugs are a matter of Christianity,” he declared. “Of course not.” Hannah Arendt agreed. In 1945 she wrote that Hitler and the Third Reich owed “nothing to any part of the Western tradition, be it German or not, Catholic or Protestant, Christian, Greek or Roman. Whether we like Thomas Aquinas or Machiavelli or Luther or Kant or Hegel or Nietzsche. . . . They have not the least responsibility for what is happening in the extermination camps.”

The myths are, in the first place, a necessary ingredient of social life. A society in which they would be eliminated in favor of exclusively scientific beliefs would have nothing in common with the human societies that have existed and do exist in the real world, and is a merely imaginary fantasy. Here once more our investigation must be concrete. Certain derivations or myths under certain circumstances are socially useful, others detrimental; when the circumstances change, so may the effects of the myths. The doctrine of the divine right of kings is scientifically ridiculous.