Showing posts with label B. Alan Wallace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label B. Alan Wallace. Show all posts

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Sunday 8 August 2021

 


If I smashed my skull in I would certainly upset my consciousness, just as if I smashed my television set I would be unable to watch what was on – something, I must admit, I am often tempted to do. But while my TV would be broken, the program I was watching would be unaffected, and would still be running on millions of other TVs. I believe that my brain acts in some way as a radio or television receiver. It doesn’t ‘cause’ the consciousness I have any more than my TV or radio ‘causes’ what is broadcast on them.


Fear is doing much of the dirty work here. It’s a useful emotion— as when it motivates us to escape from danger or fix the underlying problems that are its causes. After all, higher organisms evolved the biological capacity for fear because it helped them survive, which allowed them to pass their genes to future generations. Yet while a certain degree of fear can help us stay resilient in an ever-changing and often hazardous world, if fear is too great, and if we see no avenue for relief, it becomes horribly toxic. Most importantly, persistently high levels of fear tend to divide people into shortsighted, rigidly exclusive, and antagonistic groups.
N.B. My encapsulation: fear is a warning device, not a navigating device.

What sets Thucydides apart from the rest is the importance he attaches to honor, which can encompass shame, vengeance, ambition, and other correlates of ego. For the most part, honor is not taken very seriously today, unlike past epochs when it was something paramount to be defended at all costs, even at the cost of one’s life. The exceptions that prove the rule today are revealing: prisons and ghettos, places close to a state of nature, where to violate the code or lose respect can mean death; and the military, whose members serve a higher cause and offer up their lives in exchange for the king’s shilling. However, political actors—like the warriors in Homer’s Iliad, albeit in a less flamboyant manner—are also vitally concerned with reputation. It is a rare politician who will admit error, or even that he has changed his position on an issue.

[D]igital media turned out to be an even better tool for display, which, as the psychologist Jonathan Haidt has pointed out, is very different from communication. “We are obsessed with our reputations,” Haidt told me. “Social media has such profound effects on so many social systems because it creates a form of community in which we’re ostensibly talking to each other, but we’re really signaling virtue to people we care about.”

The list of ten fetters includes four items that are not prima-facie aspects of craving or attachment: doubt, aversion, agitation, and ignorance.

Nothing inherently exists, with its own parts and attributes, independently of our conceptual designation.

The rapidity of these developments [associated with the growth of cities] had made city-dwellers acutely aware of the pace of change. In the countryside, where life was ruled by the seasons, everybody did the same things year in and year out. But in the towns, where life was being dramatically transformed, people could see for themselves that their “actions” (karma) could have long-term consequences.

Efficient breathing activates the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system and the relaxation response. In all, the efficient breather is much calmer and more clearheaded, and probably healthier and happier, than her inefficient friend [fast, hard breathing promoted by the sympathetic nervous system].

Courage is the backbone of man. The man with courage has persistence. He states what he believes and puts it into execution. The courageous man has confidence. He draws to himself all the moral qualities and mental forces which go to make up a strong man.

Friday, July 2, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Friday 2 July 2021

 


Even though they [the subtlest discursive thoughts, mental dialogues, images, memories, desires, and emotions] go undetected, they may strongly influence our minds and behavior. Unconscious mental processes, as Freud discovered centuries after Buddhist contemplatives, can actually exert deep and lasting influences in our mental lives. This practice is a path of self-knowledge, as subconscious influences are gradually identified via increasingly refined qualitative vividness.


History, largely experienced previously as a series of natural disasters, could now be seen as a movement in which everyone could potentially enlist. Intellectuals and artists rose as a class for the first time to lend a hand in the making of history, and locate the meaning of life in politics and art rather than traditional religion. The balance in European culture shifted from the religious to the secular – a momentous process that is still ongoing in many parts of the world.

For whatever the historian calls an end, the end of a period or a tradition or a whole civilization, is a new beginning for those who are alive.

From the beginning, the clear, decisive, directed thinking that we associate with rationality is linked to aggression and force.

The tricky part . . . is how to do two very difficult things: one, to reasonably decide just what are the major differences between the male and female value spheres (à la Gilligan), and then, two, to learn ways to value them more or less equally. Not to make them the same, but to value them equally.


Sunday, January 24, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Sunday 24 January 2021



And if we’re going to reimagine and reinvigorate hope in ways that help us, we must think carefully about the relationships between time, imagination, possibility, and prediction.

We may indeed be passing through what the historian Arnold Toynbee called a “time of troubles,” the period of challenge and difficulty that precedes the disintegration of a civilization. Toynbee argues that a civilization in peril reacts in specific, recognizable patterns. One is to seek safety by a “return to the past,” by reviving a “primitive,” “archaic” way of life. The various “back to nature” and fundamentalist philosophies that have emerged in the last fifty or so years suggest something of this sort.

We face a stark choice. We can expend our waning stocks of fossil fuels, our scarce capital, and our limited political will in a vain attempt to maintain industrial civilization as it exists, or we can use those same resources to effect a necessary transition to a radically different type of civilization. But we cannot do both, and we must choose reasonably soon.

Niccolò Machiavelli: "Wise men say, and not without reason, that whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the past; for human events ever resemble those of preceding times. This arises from the fact that they are produced by men who have ever been, and ever will be, animated by the same passions…."

[F]or [Sherlock] Holmes, education means something more. Education in the Holmesian sense is a way to keep challenging yourself and questioning your habits, of never allowing System Watson to take over altogether—even though he may have learned a great deal from System Holmes along the way. It’s a way of constantly shaking up our habitual behaviors, and of never forgetting that, no matter how expert we think we are at something, we must remain mindful and motivated in everything we do.

Nothing inherently exists, with its own parts and attributes, independently of our conceptual designation.

[T]here is no escape from necessity. It will not yield, cannot submit: ne + cedere. Kant defined necessity’s German equivalent, Notwendigkeit, to mean that which “could not be otherwise.” This makes the understanding of our lives remarkably easy: whatever we are we could not have been otherwise. There is no regret, no wrong path, no true mistake. The eye of necessity reveals what we do to be only what could have been. “What might have been is an abstraction / Remaining a perpetual possibility / Only in a world of speculation. / What might have been and what has been / Point to one end, which is always present” (T. S. Eliot) [Burnt Norton]
As we perform an act, make a choice, we believe there are options. Options, Personal Agency, Choices, Decisions—these are the catchwords Ego thrives on. But if we look up from the engagement for a moment and speculate, Necessity’s implacable smile says that whatever choice you make is exactly the one required by Necessity. It could not be otherwise. At the moment the decision falls, it is necessary. Before it is decided, all lies open. For this strange reason, Necessity guarantees only risk. All is at risk in each decision, even though what is finally decided upon at once becomes necessary.


Saturday, October 17, 2020

Thoughts of the Day: Saturday 17 October 2020

 

                                            Fukuyama; more than just "The End of History"


Democracies exist and survive only because people want and are willing to fight for them; leadership, organizational ability, and oftentimes sheer good luck are needed for them to prevail.

Lister had said to his friend, “My dear Pasteur, every great benefit to the human race in every field of its activity has been bitterly fought in every stage leading up to its final acceptance.”
Young people, he says, are impatient, changeable, and appetitive—“and of the bodily appetites they are especially attentive to that connected with sex and have no control over it.”
Glucose consumption will make your pancreas release more insulin and make you gain weight, while fructose consumption will drive the accumulation of liver fat, causing insulin resistance, leading to chronic metabolic disease.
Professor Howard Fulweiler, in his essay, "The [Other] Missing Link: Owen Barfield and the Scientific Imagination," delivered at the 1983 Los Angeles MLA seminar on Owen Barfield, opens with a reference to Thomas Berger's novel, Little Big Man, in which the old Indian, Lodge Skins, tells his adopted grandson "that the Indians believe everything in the world is alive, while the white men think everything is dead." Had Barfield been there, he would have said that such mechanical thinking on the part of the white men was new, the result of something called the Scientific Revolution, which began a few centuries ago and which has given rise to philosophical and scientific hypotheses which separated mind from matter, man from nature, and doomed the reality of the spirit-world.
For each of these four kinds of mental balance, we will identify the “middle way” of homeostasis as the freedom from three kinds of imbalance: deficit, hyperactivity, and dysfunction.
We live in a world saturated with information. We have virtually unlimited amounts of data at our fingertips at all times, and we’re well versed in the arguments about the dangers of not knowing enough and not doing our homework. But what I have sensed is an enormous frustration with the unexpected costs of knowing too much, of being inundated with information. We have come to confuse information with understanding.
As William James and Henri Bergson would argue around the same time, without the selective activity of the mind there would be no “world,” only a formless chaos.

Thursday, September 17, 2020

Thoughts for the Day: Thursday 16 September 2020


 

“This isolation has left Americans quite unaware of the world beyong their borders. Americans speak few languages, know little about foreign cultures, and remain unconvinced that they need to rectify this. Americans rarely benchmark to global standards because they are sure that their way must be the best and most advanced. There is a growing gap between America's worldly business elite and cosmopolitan class, on the one hand and the majority of the American people on the other. Without real efforts to bridge it, this divide could destroy America's competitive edge and its political future.”
"The deceivers started with self-deception. Probably because of their high station and their astounding self-assurance, they were so convinced of overwhelming success..." — Hannah Arendt
Hope is stubborn. It exists in us at the cellular level and works up from there, as part of the urge to live. So hope will persist. The question is, can we put it to use? \\
--KIM STANLEY ROBINSON (cited in Homer-Dixon, Thomas. Commanding Hope (p. v). Knopf Canada. Kindle Edition.
A certain awesome futurity, then, is the inescapable condition of word-giving—as it is, in fact, of all speech—for we speak into no future that we know, much less into one that we desire, but into one that is unknown. But that it is unknown requires us to be generous toward it, and requires our generosity to be full and unconditional. The unknown is the mercy and it may be the redemption of the known. The given word may come to appear to be wrong, or wrongly given. But the unknown still lies ahead of it, and so who is finally to say? If time has apparently proved it wrong, more time may prove it right. As growth has called it into question, further growth may reaffirm it.
Attentional balance, including the development of sustained, voluntary attention, is a crucial feature of mental health and optimal performance in any kind of meaningful activity.
And the deeper-dive quote for today, short but pungent, from Hannah Arendt:
Indoctrination is dangerous because it springs primarily from a perversion, not of knowledge, but of understanding. The result of understanding is meaning, which we originate in the very process of living insofar as we try to reconcile ourselves to what we do and what we suffer.

Saturday, September 12, 2020

Thoughts for the Day: Saturday 12 September 2020

 

It is not an emergent property or function of matter, and the unquestioned belief that it must be is the greatest superstition promoted by scientists today. Consciousness, its origins, and its role in nature remain unknown to modern science.
The world as experience belongs to the basic word I-It. The basic word I-You establishes the world of relation.
“Mankind will in time discover that unbridled majorities are as tyrannical and cruel as unlimited despots,” and he [Adams] lamented that so much more blood would have to flow before the lesson was learned.
It is the specific danger of all forms of government based on equality that the moment the structure of lawfulness—within whose framework the experience of equal power receives its meaning and direction—breaks down or is transformed, the powers among equal men cancel each other out and what is left is the experience of absolute impotence. Out of the conviction of one’s own impotence and the fear of the power of all others comes the will to dominate, which is the will of the tyrant.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Buddhism by the Book: A Review of Foundations of Buddhism by Robert Gethin



Oxford University Press 1998
Robert Wright assigned a part of this book for his “Buddhism & Modern Psychology” course that I took through Coursera. The book serves as an excellent introduction to Buddhist tradition and thought. It addresses the life of the Buddha, the development of Buddhist scriptures, traditions, and lineages, and more recent developments. Through a patient consideration of scriptures and traditions, we gain insight into crucial Buddhist doctrines such as those of anatman (no self) and dependent origination. These ideas challenge our common assumptions and are crucial to understanding Buddhism. Gethin's work serves as an adept guide into this new worldview.

Gethin also spends a good deal of the book addressing the various paths that Buddhist thought and tradition have taken over about 2500 years. He divides Buddhism into three main groups:

  • southern Buddhism (the Theravadan tradition) centered Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos;
  • eastern Buddhism found in China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam based on the Mahayana tradition; and
  • northern Buddhism based on the Vajrayana tradition of Tibet, Mongolia, Nepal, and Himalayan India.
Each of these traditions has now planted roots in the West:
  •  S.N. Goenka, Joseph Goldstein, Jack Kornfield, and Stephen Levine have taught the Theravadan tradition of insight meditation;
  • D.T. Suzuki, Peter Matthiessen, the Beat Generation writers, and many others have promoted Zen Buddhism;
  • the Dalai Lama, B. Alan Wallace, and Mathieu Ricard are noteworthy proponents of Tibetan Buddhism.
And this is just a truncated list of those teachers whom I've encountered. The list of those now teaching and promoting Buddhism in the West continues to expand.

Gethin serves an important purpose in his academic treatment of the tradition: he allows those of us new to Buddhism to identify and better understand the diverse traditions. This provides us with the background appreciate how the traditions have adapted to their new, Western environments. All religious traditions—or at least those that have spread across diverse cultures and times—have changed and adapted in response to each new culture encountered. The same is true of Buddhism. Yet it’s helpful to take in the story from the beginning to get a sense of the whole. The genealogy of a set of ideas serves a genuine and important purpose, and needn’t make one into a fundamentalist—far from it!

Anyone wanting to gain a comprehensive understanding of Buddhism, its traditions, and development, would do well to start with this book.