Thursday, March 25, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Thursday 25 March 2021

 


There’s this pseudo-science myth that when you’re ‘objective’ you just disappear from the face of the earth and see everything undistorted, as it really is, like God from heaven. But that’s rubbish. When a person’s objective his attitude is remote. He gets a sort of stony, distant look on his face.


Benjamin Disraeli (1804–81) epitomized the British right’s chary accommodation to liberal modernity. A Romantic “Young England” Tory, he began as an opponent of suffrage extension and a defender of established institutions—landed property, English church, crown, old universities, and the Lords—which embodied in his mind not vested interests but conservative ideals of loyalty, deference, and faith. He ended as a pragmatic manager-tactician largely reconciled to mass democracy, social reform, and the upper classes’ loss of cultural privileges.

Whenever an event occurs that is great enough to illuminate its own past, history comes into being. Only then does the chaotic maze of past happenings emerge as a story which can be told, because it has a beginning and an end.

Violence is traditionally the ultima ratio in relationships between nations and the most disgraceful of domestic actions, being always considered the outstanding characteristic of tyranny. (The few attempts to save violence from disgrace, chiefly by Machiavelli and Hobbes, are of great relevance for the problem of power and quite illuminative of the early confusion of power with violence, but they exerted remarkably little influence on the tradition of political thought prior to our own time.)





Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Wednesday 24 March 2021

 

R.G. Collingwood at middle-age


High-grade thinking means thinking energetically instead of idly: thinking hard instead of allowing your mind to drift.

The point to which I refer is concerned with the significance of time. Modern cosmologies are in general based on the idea of evolution, and represent the development not only of one natural species or order as a development in time, but also the development of mind from nature as a development in time.

Once when he [Gottfried Lessing] was attempting to explain to himself the source of “tragic pleasure,” he said that “all passions, even the most unpleasant, are as passions pleasant” because “they make us . . . more conscious of our existence, they make us feel more real.” This sentence strikingly recalls the Greek doctrine of passions, which counted anger, for example, among the pleasant emotions but reckoned hope along with fear among the evils.

I always mention that there is a vital tension between philosophy and politics. That is, between man as a thinking being and man as an acting being, there is a tension that does not exist in natural philosophy, for example.

[German philosopher Karl] Jaspers sees the historical meaning of existential philosophy as a struggle to awaken in the individual the possibilities of an authentic and genuine life, in the face of the great modern drift toward a standardized mass society.

Now, thirty years later, the most recent unbiased review of this evidence [claiming that saturated fat is unhealthy]—from the Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization founded to do such impartial reviews—concluded that clinical trials have failed to demonstrate any meaningful benefit from eating low-fat diets and so, implicitly, any harm from eating fat-rich foods. The Cochrane review described the evidence as only “suggestive” that avoiding saturated fat specifically might avert a single heart attack, and said it’s even “less clear” whether this would lengthen anyone’s life.

Where the doubting game tests an idea by helping us see its weaknesses and shortcomings, the believing game tests an idea by helping us see the strengths of competing ideas.

Curiosity creates possibilities; the need for certainty narrows them. Curiosity creates energy; the need for certainty depletes. Curiosity results in exploration; the need for certainty creates closure. Curiosity creates movement; the need for certainty is about replaying events.


Tuesday, March 23, 2021

End the Filibuster: A Letter to My Senators

 

The U.S. Senate chamber. 


I sent the following email to my two U.S. Senators today, Senator Bennet and Senator Hickenlooper: 

Dear Senator: 


There's been a good deal of commentary about the Senate’s use of the filibuster. I have followed this commentary, and I’ve attempted to consider both sides of the argument, pro and con. I have some sympathy for the argument that legislation that can garner 60 votes may in fact be “better.” But it's an argument that’s only plausible and by no means certain. And an argument is made that legislation that requires 60 votes is more likely to remain in effect even after majority control of the Senate shifts. But this argument, too, is not persuasive. Some legislation should be repealed or modified at the earliest possible date.


In fact, what seems clear to me is that in the current political climate,  the Senate will not be able to enact vital legislation in the face of the continued intransigence of the Republican Party, which has been re-made into the Trumpist party. I see no signs of moderation in the Republican Party and no indication that they could provide a  good faith bargaining counterpart. Even those considered “moderate” or “reasonable” appear to live in fear of the dominant Trumpist majority. When the current Senate could only garner 57 votes in favor of convicting the former president of his most recent offenses, we all could see the character (or lack thereof) in the current Republican Party. You cannot bargain or hope for compromise with a party (with all too few exceptions) that now seeks to fundamentally undermine the democratic process and the rule of law. 


There are too many issues that demand action: protecting voting rights, climate change, reasonable restraints on guns, immigration, and others such that we the American people afford to suffer continued congressional inaction. Therefore, I urge you to end the Senate’s use of the filibuster. This extra-constitutional procedure has led to many more abuses than gains. It also perpetuates the already gross imbalance in representation that we find in the Senate, which in effect allows itself to be ruled by senators who represent a distinct minority of voters. We can’t continue to acquiesce to this situation. Continue to work with Republicans for the common good, by all means, but don’t pretend that you can work with a party that doesn’t have the best interests of the people, the nation, and democracy at the center of its agenda. Be done with this albatross. 


Thank you for your attention to this plea. I look forward to your response. 


Sincerely yours, 


Stephen N. Greenleaf

Colorado Springs, CO


Thoughts for the Day: Tuesday 23 March 2021

 



At a deeper cultural level, Anna Wierzbicka’s English: Meaning and Culture describes how John Locke’s writings on probability, reasonableness, and moderation became ingrained in the English language. The words “reasonable” and “probably” appear in modern English with a frequency and range of application very much higher than their cognates in other European languages, as do words indicating hedges relating to degrees of evidence such as “presumably,” “apparently,” “clearly.” These phenomena indicate an Anglophone mindset that particularly values attention to the uncertainties of evidence.

For in the end, he [Aldous Huxley] was trying to tell us that what afflicted the people in Brave New World was not that they were laughing instead of thinking, but that they did not know what they were laughing about and why they had stopped thinking.

The hard part is identifying excellence and crafting the rules of the game to elicit it. Of course, it’s immensely harder to govern scientific research than football.--Nicholas Gruen

To be free from convention is not to spurn it but not to be deceived by it. It is to be able to use it as an instrument instead of being used by it.

Stoicism and Zen have certain things in common. They both, for example, stress the importance of contemplating the transitory nature of the world around us and the importance of mastering desire, to the extent that it is possible to do so. They also advise us to pursue tranquility and give us advice on how to attain and maintain it. Furthermore, I came to realize that Stoicism was better suited to my analytical nature than Buddhism was. As a result, I found myself, much to my amazement, toying with the idea of becoming, instead of a practicing Zen Buddhist, a practicing Stoic.

Citizens never formed a deliberative whole but remained an unthinking herd. “When a candidate for public office faces the voters, he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas.”

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Sunday 21 March 2021

 

One of the outstanding books of 2020


As the century unfolds, fear is likely to become humanity’s overriding emotion. Successful worldviews— those that survive and spread through large populations— will exploit this fear to motivate people’s hero stories, for bad…. or just maybe for good.

"Comprehension [means] examining and bearing consciously the burden which our century has placed on us— neither denying its existence nor submitting meekly to its weight." --Hannah Arendt

With these two points of resemblance – imagination and narrative – in mind Collingwood is saying that history and the novel are both constructs.

[I]n scientific history…everything in the world is potential evidence for any subject whatever.--R.G. Collingwood, quoted by David Pierce in his Polytropy blog

[I]ndividual nation-states no longer possess the resources to solve their most pressing problems or to fulfill many of their basic responsibilities, much less provide expected benefits to citizens. As their power and authority wane, they are beginning to decompose into their ethnic, religious, ideological, and class components.

James Sullivan, writing influential essays under the name of “Cassius,” [at the time of the ratification of the Constitution] proclaimed: “Thus we see that no office, however exalted, can protect the miscreant, who dares invade the liberties of his country, or countenance in his crimes the impious villain who sacrilegiously attempts to trample upon the rights of freemen.”15 In my view, this point is central, even defining, because it connects the power of impeachment with the American Revolution itself. On this account, a violation of liberty or rights is an impeachable offense—even if it is not itself a crime.

But when we release copious amounts of adrenaline into our bodies today and just sit and try to think our way out of a problem, that extra energy boost has nowhere to go. Stress needs a physical counterpart.

Confusion is hypnotic because it creates absorption: that's it! If you are confused you are temporarily trying to understand something – this absorbs your attention.


Saturday, March 20, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Saturday 20 March 2021

 


Believing is not to be reduced to thinking that such-and-such might be the case. It is not a weaker form of thinking, laced with doubt. Sometimes we speak like this: ‘I believe that the train leaves at 6.13’, where ‘I believe that’ simply means that ‘I think (but am not certain) that’. Since the left hemisphere is concerned with what is certain, with knowledge of the facts, its version of belief is that it is just absence of certainty. If the facts were certain, according to its view, I should be able to say ‘I know that’ instead. This view of belief comes from the left hemisphere's disposition towards the world: interest in what is useful, therefore fixed and certain (the train timetable is no good if one can't rely on it). So belief is just a feeble form of knowing, as far as it is concerned.


In Frankenstein’s Castle Wilson remarked that although Freud was right that the unconscious is much more powerful than the conscious mind, he was wrong to believe that therefore it was in control. This scenario, of the unconscious lording it over the puppet-like ego, became very popular in the twentieth century, and contributed significantly to the feeling of helplessness and the ‘worm’s eye view’. (Wilson has even taken Jung to task for this; see C. G. Jung: Lord of the Underworld (1984))

Whereas in the archaic and magical structures silence reigns—consciousness remaining in an “autistic” uroboric state before the rise of language—in the mythical structure language emerges as a form of sacred power, creating both a “self” and a “world” outside and other than that self.25 Language then is a medium for polarities.

A conception is fixed and held only when it has been embodied in a symbol. So the study of symbolic forms offers a key to the forms of human conception. The genesis of symbolic forms—verbal, religious, artistic, mathematical, or whatever modes of expression there be—is the odyssey of the mind.


As your waist circumference expands, your risk of heart disease goes up. As your blood pressure elevates, so does your risk for heart disease, and stroke as well. The worse your blood sugar control (glucose intolerance), the more likely you are to be diabetic, and the more plaque deposition you’re likely to have in your arteries.

And it never failed that during the dry years the people forgot about the rich years, and during the wet years they lost all memory of the dry years. It was always that way.

If we drop the “-ology” and just stick with “telos,” we can get back to its first and original meaning (formulated by Aristotle): “that for the sake of which.”

Friday, March 19, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Friday 19 March 2021

 

2014 publication from MIT Press


As Whitehead noted, exalting the scientific over the aesthetic was a “disastrous error” that left us caught “between the gross specialized values of the mere practical man, and the thin specialized values of the mere scholar”—that is, between Wall Street and the Ivory Tower—without a solid or realistic basis for making critical decisions.


In terms of politics, nature had taught Hitler only two “laws.” One was the “trampling to death” of alien species “to maintain [one’s own] species.” The other was “not to value the individual life too highly,” that is, it was all right to trample to death individuals of one’s own species. The latter principle he even considered a “divine law,” the only one in which he was inclined to believe. He demonstrated the dispensation of God with the example of—flies.

It has often been said that the British acquired their empire in a fit of absent-mindedness, as consequence of automatic trends, yielding to what seemed possible and what was tempting, rather than as a result of deliberate policy. If this is true, then the road to hell may just as well be paved with no intentions as with the proverbial good ones.

If violence is the midwife of history and violent action therefore the most dignified of all forms of human action, what will happen when, after the conclusion of class struggle and the disappearance of the state, no violence will even be possible? How will men be able to act at all in a meaningful, authentic way? Finally, when philosophy has been both realized and abolished in the future society, what kind of thought will be left?

It is no truism to stress that the hard-right vote is a right-wing vote. The hard right has grown out of a conservative electorate.

The very simple assumption underlying the LCHF/ketogenic diet is that it’s the carbohydrate-rich foods we eat that make us unhealthy: both fat and sick.

“Thomas Jefferson explained the power of language with the help of an analogy: “He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.”30”