Showing posts with label Ernest Hemingway. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ernest Hemingway. Show all posts

Friday, May 7, 2021

Thoughts for the Day: Friday 7 May 2021

 


In their different modes, Hodge and [Nathaniel] Hawthorne were conservative counterinstances to the callow picture of the early American national spirit as liberal, democratic, and optimistic.

[Gustav] Le Bon divided crowds into heterogeneous (with mixed membership) or homogeneous (the same sort of members). The first kind could be “anonymous” (street crowds) or “non-anonymous” (juries or parliaments, both prone to groupthink). Homogeneous crowds included sects and castes (for example, priests, judges, military officers, or factory workers), as well as social classes (the peasantry, the middle-classes). When crowd-thinking seized a social caste, it tended to crystallize and last. The caste then listened only to itself and sought to capture authority in order to control the masses.

Communicability itself therefore becomes one of the central issues of this philosophy. In [Karl] Jaspers’s view, communication is the pre-eminent form of philosophical participation, which is at the same time communal philosophizing whose purpose is not to produce results but to “illuminate existence.” The similarity of this method to Socrates’s maieutic method is obvious, except that what Socrates would have called maieutic method, Jaspers calls appeal.

The secret was probably the appearance of fiction. Large numbers of strangers can cooperate successfully by believing in common myths.

“There is only one way to avoid criticism. Do nothing. Be nothing. Say nothing.” —Aristotle

"My working habits are simple: long periods of thinking, short periods of writing."

— Ernest Hemingway

The quickest to be offended are the easiest to manipulate. (Anon.)

“People think focus means saying yes to the thing you’ve got to focus on. But that’s not what it means at all. It means saying no to the hundred other good ideas that there are. You have to pick carefully. I’m actually as proud of the things we haven’t done as the things I have done."

— Steve Jobs

"Those who choose the lesser evil forget very quickly that they chose evil."

— Hannah Arendt




Tuesday, November 3, 2020

Thoughts for the Day: Tuesday 3 November 2020--Election Day USA

 



Increasingly, only the collective human ego—what I call “the Big I”—bounds and defines this constructed world. We subordinate, alter, and reinvent almost everything around us according to our own interests, from the mountains of Vancouver Island to the Isle of Dogs and the very sky overhead. Seduced by our extraordinary technological prowess, many of us come to believe that external reality—the reality outside our constructed world—is unimportant and needs little attention because, if we ever have to, we can manage any problem that might arise there. And, in any case, as the pace of our lives accelerates, we have less time to reflect on these broader circumstances.

The left-wing critique of liberalism is chiefly an attack on liberal faith in reform.

This biography . . . stands in a tradition. It is the tradition of good lives, inaugurated by Aristotle, amplified by Aquinas, liberated from Christianity and given the doctrine of the “civil affections” by David Hume and Adam Smith. Our tradition is rooted deep in its own history by Hegel as being the only foundation it could possibly justify, and thereafter domesticated by the British tradition that made Hegel tolerable and culminates (for our purposes) in R. G. Collingwood.
This tradition teaches that a good life may be lived only in terms of those virtues which an individual truly possesses and is capable of. The trouble with the word “tradition” is that it has, damnably, been so monopolised by the political Right, which contrasts the stability of tradition with the crazy enthusiasms of revolutionary struggle. But a moral tradition is no less than the embodiment through time and in a place of those principles which permit that version of a good life to be lived, revised, challenged, and transformed in the biographies of the traditionalists.

Maslow’s ‘holistic’ model of the psychic organism led him to three major conclusions: (1) Neurosis may be regarded as the blockage of the channels of self-actualization. (2) A synergic society—one in which all individuals may reach a high level of self-satisfaction, without restricting anybody else’s freedom—should evolve naturally from our present social system. (3) Business efficiency and the recognition of ‘higher ceilings of human nature’ are not incompatible; on the contrary, the highest levels of efficiency can only be obtained by taking full account of the need for self-actualization that is present in every human being.

 Enjoying living was learning to get your money’s worth and knowing when you had it.