 |
| More scholarly work |
 |
| Lots of good examples, relaxed narrative |
Rhetoric, the art and practice of persuasion through language, was once the cornerstone of Western political,
legal, and educational systems. The Greeks invented it, the Romans refined it,
the Middle Ages put it at the pinnacle of the educational system, and the
Moderns updated into the world of print and democracy. But today, few people use
the term “rhetoric” without adding the prefix “mere”. President Obama, starting
back when he was only candidate Obama, received frequent derision (by
opponents) for his outstanding oratory. “Just words”“, all talk, no action”,
and so on. What is rhetoric that it once was the crowning jewel of an educated
person, but now is more often the subject of derision?
Both of these
books address the nature, substance, and history of rhetoric. The Toyes book examines
rhetoric from a more academic perspective (it’s part of the Oxford University
Press “Very Short Introduction” series), and Lieth’s book approaches the topic in
a more relaxed style. In fact, both books cover much the same territory,
especially in their narrative about the history of rhetoric. Toyes spends more
time on contemporary thinkers and permutations of rhetorical practice while Leith
devotes more time to breaking down the sub-topics of the discipline and
discussing prominent examples. Leith's examples include Satan (channeled by John Milton), Lincoln,
Churchill (does anyone writing about rhetoric not discuss Churchill?), Hitler
(not all popular speakers are good guys), Martin Luther King, Jr. (like
Churchill, a must), Obama, and the anonymous (to the public) speechwriters of
politicians in the modern era.
Each book provides numerous examples of rhetoric in action,
and each provides a great deal of ammunition to those like me who believe
rhetoric a useful art and discipline of the highest order. As someone whose profession
involves “pleading” on behalf of others and “arguing” cases, I only wish that
I’d had a deeper and more practiced introduction and study of rhetoric much
earlier in my education. So to me, both books are preaching to the choir.
However, even now, after having made up some ground of early deficiencies in my
learning, I gained a good deal from these two works. Toyes, for instance,
really focuses on rhetoric in the broader context of the contemporary world,
touching on how, for instance, Kenneth Burke’s work changes the focus of
rhetoric from “persuasion” to “identification”. He also brings in the work of
J.L. Austin, whose How to Do Things WithWords brings a new classification scheme into use that enhances our
understanding of rhetoric and language. Leith, on the other hand, focuses more
on the nuts and bolts of rhetoric, things like invention, figures of speech,
the occasions of rhetoric, and the means of persuasion set forth in Aristotle’s
foundational work (ethos, logos, and pathos).
I enjoyed both books and learned a good deal from each. For
beginners, I’d definitely recommend the Leith book with its numerous examples
and consideration of the fundamental tenants of rhetoric. For those more
acquainted with the topic, Toyes book puts rhetoric into a larger context,
especially in the contemporary world.
